Sensible Erection | XPYC Team Versus

Wednesday, 1 September 2010

quote [ Мультсериал Versus: Хруст без правил ]

The ultimate battles you never thought you would see. PacMan Vs. Mario, Harry Potter Vs. Frodo, Contra Vs. Tetris... English title Youtube links in extended.

[art] [by Transfer@5:07pmGMT] [+10 Funny]

Comments

yevishere said @ 5:49pm GMT on 1st Sep [Score:2 Insightful]
You could tell its made by Russians because most of the time nobody wins.

yevishere said @ 5:56pm GMT on 1st Sep
Correction NO one EVER wins.

ComposerNate said @ 6:01pm GMT on 1st Sep
Statue beat Godzilla

yevishere said @ 6:07pm GMT on 1st Sep
And yet the city was destroyed and the statue of liberty was holding shit.

ComposerNate said @ 7:39pm GMT on 1st Sep
You are unfamiliar perhaps with victory shit?

Asscheeks Akimbo said @ 6:20pm GMT on 1st Sep
Also the crazy made-up alphabet.

Todomanna said @ 7:05pm GMT on 1st Sep
Technically all alphabets are made-up.

Asscheeks Akimbo said @ 7:37pm GMT on 1st Sep
Yeah, but not on the spot.

Krutz said @ 7:27pm GMT on 1st Sep [Score:1 Funny]
How could you leave out Jackie Chan vs. the Eye of Sauron?

Transfer said @ 8:06pm GMT on 1st Sep
I figured that people would click through as they went. I didn't want to fill the extended with every single video, especially as they keep adding them.

donnie said @ 9:57pm GMT on 1st Sep
This was the first one I clicked - the translation is ridiculous :

Джек Ичан --> Djek Ichan

...ohh, those Russians

Krutz said @ 7:29pm GMT on 1st Sep
Not to mention "Worms" vs. "Darkwing Duck." How does Russia get nerdier commercials than us?

symmetrian said @ 7:44pm GMT on 1st Sep
Blackwing? Really?

Transfer said @ 8:08pm GMT on 1st Sep
I suspect, at least part of it is the fact that they are not respecting copyright in the slightest, except perhaps by misspelling things...

lilmookieesquire said @ 8:01pm GMT on 1st Sep
COntra vs tetris was nastier than I thought it would be.

f00m@nB@r said @ 8:32pm GMT on 1st Sep
http://gizmodo.com/5627807/bubbling-tricks-your-mind-to-makes-anyone-naked

Gunner v2.0 said @ 9:11pm GMT on 1st Sep
Heh. Butts.

Transfer said @ 9:35pm GMT on 1st Sep [Score:1 Interesting]
Uhh... this one was listed in the suggested videos section on the side... I'm just posting it here to remind me to watch it when I get out of work...

Transfer said @ 12:30am GMT on 2nd Sep
Holy shit. After watching that and taking a look at the site, I must say it's nearly post worthy on it's own. I'll save it for another day, unless someone wants to steal some karma.

But man oh man, what a... inspiration to exercise.

hippoh said @ 1:24am GMT on 2nd Sep [Score:2 Informative]
Her name is Zuzana, and she did hardcore porn back in the day under the name Susana Spears, so you can see all she has to offer. Though to be honest, she looks much better in the workout outfits that she chooses to wear in her bodyrock.tv site videos.

She's the queen of 4chan's Health & Fitness (/fit/) subforum, because not only is she hot, her site shows you how to do great calisthenic (body weight) exercises or routines with only small weights, a mat, or even a chair. Good place for girls to get into working out and even a good place to pick up some exercises you can do at home or in your hotel room when you're traveling. Plus she drinks protein shakes which puts all the aspiring weight lifters in high spirits because she's a girl.

The 4chan detectives have divined that she did porn as a means to finance her real desire to be a fitness expert, and threads on her forum asking about her past or inquiring about future nudity are deleted. It's a shame too because, well, look....:

donnie said @ 10:08pm GMT on 1st Sep

Prince of Persia vs a shrimp

donnie said @ 10:10pm GMT on 1st Sep
This is SE worthy...

Jason vs Elton John

donnie said @ 10:11pm GMT on 1st Sep
...erm the right link

theolypse said @ 11:33pm GMT on 1st Sep
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfHKHW4j0Kc&feature=fvw

sanepride said @ 2:03am GMT on 2nd Sep
Cute little 'toons.
Looks like they're all part of an advertising campaign for some kind of potato chip or something.
So, the philosophical question is - If it's made in the service of advertising, does it still count as 'art'?

jamesdiemer said @ 2:35pm GMT on 2nd Sep
Really depends on whether you believe that what makes art is an inherent lack of utility or function (a common definition throughout history) or is based on a level of aesthetic quality determined by the media where it appears (The other side of the argument).

Humorously enough, I posed those 2 sides of the discussion in a class and had the students read excerpts from 1000 years of the debate. One of my students asked me which was the correct answer...he honestly thought I knew and could tell him.

sanepride said @ 12:36am GMT on 3rd Sep
Just for future reference -
The correct answer is 'a'.